The questions and answers presented in this section reflect actual enquiries and situations from previous NCMAS calls. The Committee and Secretariat recommend that all applicants read this FAQ section in full.
Table of Contents
1.1 I have a question about NCMAS 2024 and can't find an answer in this FAQ. How do I get more information?
Email email@example.com if you have any questions about NCMAS. This email will reach the Secretariat, who will contact you with further information.
1.2 What is the deadline for application?
The application deadline is 8:00pm AEDT (5:00pm AWST) Tuesday 3 October 2023.
1.3 Can I request an exception to the application deadline if it overlaps with a work commitment, such as a conference?
Unfortunately, no. If you have commitments at or near the deadline you are advised to submit your application as soon as possible during the call.
1.4 If I have a draft application in the NCMAS system at the time of the submission deadline will I be allowed extra time to finish and submit my application?
No. Applications cannot be submitted after the deadline.
1.5 Can I resubmit my application from the previous NCMAS call with minor changes and updates?
However, resubmission of an application as-is from the previous call without updates to reflect progress is not recommended and should be reviewed for compliance. Your application from the NCMAS 2023 round can be viewed at https://my.nci.org.au/mancini/ncmas/2023/.
Note, also, that all CIs on your project should update their career profiles and research track records to reflect recent developments or changes.
Compliance for NCMAS 2024 includes anonymous third-person style for the Proposal and Computational Details components.
1.6 The outcome of my ARC or NHMRC grant proposal is expected to be announced during the NCMAS call. How do I include this outcome in my NCMAS application?
Research funding outcomes announced in the September-December time frame are relevant to your application.
You may submit an addendum to add recently announced funding via email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
1.7 What period is covered by the "previous five (5) years" requirement for publications and grants?
The "previous five years" period extends from 1 January 2018 to the present, inclusive.
1.8 Is it possible to transfer my project to another Lead Chief Investigator?
Yes. The recommended process is:
• The new Lead CI should register and join the project using the MyNCI system (https://my.nci.org.au).
• If you (as current Lead CI) wish to leave the project, you should promote another project member to the Delegate Lead CI role, and then leave the project. Leaving the project will elevate the Delegate Lead CI to the (full) Lead CI role.
• If you (current Lead CI) wish to remain in the project in a (regular) CI or Researcher role then submit an NCI support request to change your project role. The support request can be submitted by email to email@example.com. Please provide the project code, your request and the new Lead CI's information in the support request.
1.9 I'd like to include as many researchers as possible on my project to demonstrate its significance and impact.
• Can I include former members of my group, with whom I still collaborate?
A Lead Chief Investigator should update their project memberships to include personnel who will actively contribute to the project during the next calendar year.
• Inclusion of former group members who will no longer contribute to the research is not recommended.
• Retention of a previous Chief Investigator could inadvertently breach eligibility rules if that CI is now listed on another NCMAS application.
• The key rule to observe is: An investigator can be named as a Lead CI or (regular) CI on one project only
1.10 I am a research student, and my supervisor has asked me to complete the NCMAS application for our research group. What do I do?
Your supervisor needs to change your project role to Delegate Lead CI to enable you to access the online NCMAS application form.
• Note that as Delegate Lead CI you become the responsible agent for the application. You will need to keep your supervisor informed through the call for applications period.
1.11 Why do I need to update memberships of my NCMAS project?
The members of you project should include only those who actively contribute to the project. Prior members of you research team who will no longer contribute should be removed from your project.
Note that removing former team members is also required under Conditions of Use for NCI and other HPC facilities.
1.12 My research team includes people who will not be involved in computational work for my project. Should these non-computational team members be included in my NCMAS application?
Team members who are not part of computational activities are not required to be listed on your application.
Note that if you do wish to include such persons, they will need to register for an NCI user account and join your project.
1.13 Does the word length limit for the Proposal apply to both the Proposal body and references?
No. The word length limit mentioned in the Information for Applicants document applies to the Proposal body only, excluding references.
1.14 Can I request less than 1000 kSU per year in the NCMAS 2024 call?
No. The minimum request size for NCMAS has gone up, with both NCI and Pawsey setting the minimum requests at 1 MSU/1000 kSU.
Applicants with smaller requests are advised to contact the facilities' alternative allocation schemes or access partner share allocations on the facilities.
1.15 Can I attach my CV instead of entering publication and grant information on the application form?
No. It is not possible to attach a CV to the application. Please enter relevant publication and grant information on the online form.
1.16 Our NCMAS Proposal contains graphs and images. How do I include figures in my application?
Submission of the Proposal and Computational Details via PDF upload in your application lets you including figures, graphics and graphs as required.
1.17 My project requires HPC resources for two types of work, Research and development, and Ongoing operations, for example, a data analysis service.
Can I use NCMAS to obtain resources for both types of work?
NCMAS should be used to obtain resources for your research and development work.
Facility and/or partner schemes are usually the appropriate resourcing channels for operational or service HPC workloads.
1.18 Can I modify or correct errors in my NCMAS application after submission?
Submission is considered final, as noted in the Information for Applicants, so an application cannot be modified following submission.
You may submit an addendum to add recently announced funding via email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
1.19 How can I make my application more competitive?
First, make sure you are applying in the category appropriate to your level of experience.
• Postdoctoral fellows who are establishing themselves in the field are advised to submit an Early Career Researcher (ECR) application.
All applicants should read the Information for Applicants in full, pay attention to detail, and demonstrate to the fullest extent their ability to use national facility HPC resources at scale.
1.20 Why is the application process so complex?
NCMAS is very competitive and resources are limited. Applications must capture detailed information needed by the Committee to assess scientific merit and the ability to use HPC resources at scale.
1.21 Why don't I receive detailed feedback about my application?
NCMAS receives approximately 250-300 applications in each yearly call. Committee workloads are such that detailed feedback for each application is not possible; each member of the Committee will assess between 20 and 50 applications. The Committee will, however, try to provide brief suggestions to the applicant in as many cases as possible. The Committee will also record comments raised during the allocation meeting for inclusion in your outcome.
1.22 Can I get advice on how to write my NCMAS application?
Unfortunately, the Secretariat and Committee are not able to provide specific advice to individual applicants. All applicants are advised to:
1. Make sure to read all supporting documentation, including rules and guidelines.
2. Read through the example Proposal and Computational Details provided – this was a highly ranked submission from the 2020 round.
3. Check your eligibility. If you have questions about eligibility contact the Secretariat as soon as possible.
4. Update your profile and research track record and contact the CIs in your research team to ensure they have completed updates.
5. Make a compelling case for your proposed research.
6. Demonstrate your ability to use the national HPC facilities at scale.
7. Include references for all research funding over the previous 5 years.
8. Submit your application through the optional compliance check for A3P. It is the responsibility of the applicant to make any suggested changes before final submission.
9. Write clearly. Pay attention to detail.
10. Respect the guidelines and the submission deadline.
11. Review the example application provided.
1.23 My NCMAS 2023 application was unsuccessful. Why didn't I receive an allocation?
In most cases NCMAS applications are not successful for one of the following reasons:
1. Eligibility issues;
2. Non-compliant or incomplete application;
3. Poor conception or development of proposal;
4. Insufficient demonstration of peak-scale HPC requirement;
5. Inadequate justification of HPC resource request;
6. Ambit claims for large-scale resources.
New applicants to NCMAS should, if possible, demonstrate a track record of effective HPC utilisation through partner or facility resourcing schemes.
1.24 Why do some projects receive large NCMAS allocations?
The Committee will consider allocation of more than 5-10 MSU/year to applications which demonstrate exceptional and sustained track records of HPC utilisation, and which make a compelling case for HPC resources at large scale.
• Projects in this category typically present well documented resource requests with compelling justification, and with extensive details of methodology, workflows, application performance, and scalability.
• These projects also have strong records of successful grant proposals and research output.
1.25 What is the proper length and level of detail for an NCMAS Proposal?
Refer to the Information for Applicants document. The length excludes references.
Computational Details Length
Refer to the Information for Applicants document. The length excludes references.
Proposal and Computational Details must be provided as a PDF upload (one file only – both components should be included).
NCMAS proposal documents which are more than 10% longer than the stated limit in the Information for Applicants document will be considered non-compliant.
1.26 Is the project description in the NCI new project application the same as the Proposal for NCMAS in the application form at https://ncmas.nci.org.au?
The description in the NCI new project registration (at https://my.nci.org.au) is treated as a proposal abstract for the purposes of NCMAS.
The full, detailed proposal must be submitted in the NCMAS online application form – https://ncmas.nci.org.au.
Newly registered projects for NCMAS which is available at https://my.nci.org.au remain in "pending approval" state until their NCMAS outcome is determined.
NCI will approve project registrations for successful applications after NCMAS outcomes are finalised.
1.28 How do I use the ORCID functionality in my NCMAS application?
Applicants must import publication references from ORCID via the interface in the MyNCI system (https://my.nci.org.au). The ORCID interface allows the user to nominate publications from their ORCID record for inclusion in an NCMAS application.
(Note that the MyNCI system's ORCID implementation gathers data from ORCID only; it is not an alternative tool for managing your ORCID record.)
Detailed instructions for using ORCID are provided in supporting documentation via the NCMAS website.
ORCID will be the only method for managing publications in your NCMAS application.
All applicants should read supporting documentation for ORCID functionality in full.
1.29 Can I add/update project members to my NCMAS application after submitting?
The NCMAS system will take a snapshot of the project membership at the time of application submission. Adding/updating project members after the submission will not be reflected in the NCMAS application.
1.30 Can I add/update career profiles and publications for all CIs to the NCMAS application after submitting?
The NCMAS system will take a snapshot of the project members' career profiles and publications at the time of submission. Adding/updating career profiles and publications after submission will not be reflected in the application.
1.31 I have drafted a new project proposal for the NCMAS scheme (proposal-XXXXXX) and want to add people to this project proposal.
How do I add people to my new project?
Anyone who wants to join the new project proposal (proposal-XXXXXX) should visit https://my.nci.org.au/mancini/project/proposal-XXXXXX/join to request the project membership. Then the Lead CI of this proposed project will be able to approve the membership request using the MyNCI system (https://my.nci.org.au).
However, please note that, this needs to be done before submitting the application as adding/updating project members after the application submission will not be reflected in the submitted NCMAS application.
1.32 I am a Delegated Lead CI and have discovered the project I'm applying for no longer has a Lead CI.
What should I do?
You should get a suitable Lead CI on the project as soon as you can. You will not be able to submit an application for the project unless the Lead CI role is filled.
As a Delegated Lead CI you can use the invitation function in the MyNCI system (https://my.nci.org.au) to invite a new project member on board, or ask the new project member to register at MyNCI and request to join the project. You will have privileges to approve the new project member's membership. Then submit a support request by email to email@example.com to promote the new project member as a Lead CI of the project.
2.1 I was unable to utilise most of my 2023 NCMAS allocation due to unforeseen circumstances or external dependencies. Can I still apply to NCMAS 2024?
Yes. Your application should clearly explain the circumstances leading to under-utilisation of your 2023 allocation. Your application should provide a strong justification of your 2024 resource request.
If your project has used less than 90% of your 2023 allocation at 2023 Q3 (pro rata), you should provide an explanation for the underutilisation of your current allocation.
• Unjustified underutilisation may impact negatively on the merit of the application.
2.2 My project expects to use its NCMAS allocation at specific periods during 2024, and to have some corresponding periods of low usage. Can I request that my allocation be provided non-uniformly across quarters in 2024 to accommodate this operational requirement?
Non-uniform installation of a compute allocation is at the discretion of the HPC facility. Generally, facilities can accommodate small variations in quarterly allocations. They will not, however, be able to install an allocation into just one or two quarters, for example.
Applicants who have scheduling dependencies and expect to have seasonal or varying usage are advised to engage directly with the facilities to discuss their options.
2.3 In 2023, I consumed my allocations before the end of each quarter. Can I request supplemental allocations if I face a similar situation in 2024?
No. Unfortunately, NCMAS is unable to provide supplemental allocations because it is heavily oversubscribed. Supplemental allocations are best sought from partner schemes if additional resources are needed during the year.
2.4 Why have my previous NCMAS allocations been less than the amount requested?
NCMAS allocations are highly competitive; demand for resources typically exceeds supply by a factor of 2-3. The Committee determines each allocation based on the merit of the proposal and track record of the project and its CIs. The Committee must also adjust allocations to attempt to optimise usage of the NCMAS resource shares.
2.5 Can I appeal if I am not satisfied with my NCMAS outcome?
Allocation decisions by the Committee are final. Appeals will be considered only against administrative or procedural issues and not against decisions of the Committee or against assessor ratings and comments, in a manner consistent with the practices of the Australian Research Council.
Administrative appeals must be submitted by the project Lead CI, via email to firstname.lastname@example.org, within the deadline.
2.6 Can I apply for a Pawsey/Setonix allocation and use other Pawsey resources?
Resources are allocated on the nominated NCMAS systems via the NCMAS allocation application process.
The facilities do have access to other technologies and services, and access to these resources may be requested if needed. These other systems may be leveraged after the allocation on the main systems has been awarded if there is capacity and the researcher requests to do so with the facility.
3.1 I am a research student, and my supervisor has asked me to submit an application to NCMAS. What should I do?
As a research student you are not eligible to apply for NCMAS. You should advise your supervisor to check their eligibility and apply.
3.2 As a Lead CI, I want to delegate preparation of my NCMAS application to a senior member of my research group. How do I do this?
Promoting a team member to a Delegated Lead CI role on your project will grant them access to the NCMAS online application system. Promotion is done through the MyNCI system (https://my.nci.org.au):
1. Log in to MyNCI system (https://my.nci.org.au).
2. Go to your project listing (click on project name - in blue).
3. Select your delegate's name after clicking on the Members tab (click on name).
4. Use the Change tab to change the person's role to Delegated Lead CI.
5. Submit the change.
3.3 I am a Lead CI on my own project, and I also collaborate closely with a research group at another university. Can I be included as a (regular) CI on my collaborator's NCMAS application?
No. An individual can be a CI or Lead CI on one NCMAS application only.
Membership as a CI or Lead CI in more than one NCMAS application will render all such applications noncompliant.
3.4 I have recently started a Postdoctoral appointment and wish to submit an application to NCMAS. What should I do?
You are eligible to apply to NCMAS, however, you will be expected to demonstrate that you have independent research funding support, such as an ARC DECRA or similar award.
Applications which do not provide evidence of independent research funding will be disqualified before merit assessment.
There is also an expectation that Lead CIs with recent Postdoctoral appointments will apply in the Early Career Researcher (ECR) category.
3.5 I have recently resumed my research career after a period of interruption.
Am I eligible to apply to NCMAS?
You are eligible to apply in the Special Consideration (SC) category provided your research work has resumed within the last five (5) years, and your PhD was awarded within the previous nine (9) years.
Please also note that SC applications are expected to demonstrate independent funding support.
3.6 I am a Research Scientist employed at an Australian Government science agency (e.g. ANSTO, BoM, CSIRO, DST, Geoscience Australia). Am I eligible to apply?
Yes, however applicants from Australian Government agencies are expected to hold a position of CSOF5 (or equivalent) or higher.
3.7 Our research group pursues several related compute-intensive research projects, with each research thread is led by a different member of the group. Can we submit individual NCMAS applications for each body of work in the combined research effort?
No. The group should submit a single, combined application to NCMAS. Note that an individual may be Lead CI or CI on one application only, so individual applications submitted in this case would be ruled non-compliant.
3.8 I am an experimentalist who wishes to use NCMAS to supplement my research with theory/computation. Am I eligible to apply?
Yes. Your application should aim to demonstrate HPC expertise of your group and clearly describe how computation will contribute to your research plan.
3.9 I am a new research faculty/Postdoctoral appointment, but do not yet have a track record of funding support. Am I eligible to apply?
NCMAS applicants are expected to demonstrate a record of independent funding support. NCMAS recommends that you investigate HPC resourcing through your local institution, which may have an active partnership with one or more of the NCMAS facilities: NCI or Pawsey.
A resource allocation from your institution can be a vehicle for development of HPC expertise, with a view toward a future NCMAS application.
Additionally, the NCI Adapter Allocation Scheme or other smaller scale allocation schemes may be a useful way to develop the skills and experience to apply to NCMAS in the future.
3.10 If a Researcher on a project is promoted to a Delegated Lead CI role to manage the project's NCMAS application, can that Researcher also be a Delegated Lead CI or (regular) CI on another NCMAS application?
A person who is a Researcher on two projects cannot be promoted to a Delegated Lead CI role on both projects for the purposes of completing the applications.
If any person is a (regular) CI on one project, and a Researcher on another, the Lead CIs on both projects should exercise care about personnel roles.
3.11 A Postdoctoral Fellow will be joining my project in January 2024 (formal job offer has been accepted) and I would like to include them as a CI on my NCMAS application. The future Postdoc will not receive their PhD until December 2023. Can I include this Postdoc as a (regular) CI on my NCMAS application?
A PhD candidate may be included as a (regular) CI on an NCMAS application.
Note, however, that the Committee will review research track records of the Lead CI and all (regular) CIs as part of the assessment process.
If the PhD candidate has outstanding research outputs this could be a positive factor for the application.
If there are few or no demonstrable research outputs, it might be better for the PhD student to take a Researcher role.
3.12 I have an Emeritus position at my institution. Am I eligible to apply?
A project Lead CI with Emeritus status is eligible to apply to NCMAS.
However, there is a general expectation that Emeritus-led projects will have a relatively modest size team and scope, compared to larger projects with top-tier resource requests.
3.13 Does NCMAS use the term 'ECR' in the same way as the ARC, NHMRC, my university, or other grant agencies?
For NCMAS, the term ECR is used to define a specific application category and set of eligibility criteria. NCMAS does not use the term ECR in the same way as other granting agencies or institutions, so NCMAS applicants should not assume the term has the same meaning.
All applicants are advised to read NCMAS supporting documentation in full for further information.
3.14 I am an early career researcher who would like to apply in the ECR category and also be included in my group leader's NCMAS standard category application. Is this possible?
Unfortunately, NCMAS rules state that you can be a CI on only one application.
If you wish to apply for your own ECR project, you cannot be listed on your group leader's project as a CI.
You can, however, remain on your group leader's project in a Researcher role. As a Researcher, your track record information will not be considered in the assessment process.
4.1 Why is NCMAS using double-anonymous reviews?
NCMAS places a high value on the equity and integrity of the proposal review process.
The goal is to minimise potential sources of bias.
Several studies have shown that a reviewer's attitude toward a submission may be affected, either consciously or unconsciously, by the identity of the lead author or principal investigator (for more information - see the Women in STEM Ambassador Research Project).
Reviews of other resource allocation schemes has shown that proposals led by women have systematically lower success rates than those led by men.
Studies suggest a double-anonymous process would significantly reduce the potential for bias, whether by gender, affiliation, or country of origin.
Such a process may also level the playing field between new and established researchers.
4.2 Are truly anonymous submissions even possible?
Even in the relatively small community of computationally- and data-intensive research fields, it is not as likely as one might believe to correctly guess the authorship of a proposal.
While it is possible to correctly guess the authorship, studies from other similarly small fields suggest the Lead CI's identity would remain unknown 60% to 75% of the time.
So, while a system that provided perfectly unbreakable anonymity would be ideal, our goal is simply to obscure identity, to discourage guessing, and to reduce unconscious bias, and not make authorship a focus of the evaluation of a proposal.
4.3 How will you know if the experiment was successful or not?
The Facilities do not consider the move to a double-anonymous process to be an 'experiment'.
It is one in a progression of changes that are being implemented to improve the equity and integrity of the proposal review process.
NCMAS will continue to evaluate the review process, with attention to fairness and balance over several factors.
If you would like to be sent the published results from the Women in STEM Ambassador's Trial, you can check the box in the consent section of the application form.
4.4 Is there scientific evidence that anonymising proposals results in a reduction of bias?
Yes. While this process may be new to computationally- and data-intensive research fields, there is an abundance of literature on this topic from many different fields. The Women in STEM Ambassador's Research Project – National Trial of Anonymising Research Funding Proposals – has reviewed the literature on this topic, and the results are clear: the removal of names and affiliations results in reduced bias in the review process. Some relevant journal articles on this are available in the Anonymous – Double Blind Review Bibliography.
4.5 How difficult is anonymisation for applicants?
The double anonymous proposal review process may require some changes, particularly for new applicants, in the way they write their proposals. The Information for Applicants and Anonymisation Guide documents describe these changes and aid in the proposal preparation. The changes are mostly in the style, structure, and grammar used in describing the work.
While not a lot of work, it may not be as simple as resubmitting previous versions of the same manuscript. If you are re-applying, the previous version of your application will be available as read-only for you to use as a reference - https://my.nci.org.au/mancini/ncmas/2023/.
Please pay particular attention to the inclusion of career interruptions. This information will be used to create an anonymised track-record for your team that will be available to the Committee as part of their review.
4.6 How will the review process work?
The first stage of review is mandatory for all reviewers. In this phase, the reviewers will not know the identity of the applicants. The assessors are encouraged to focus on the scientific merit of the Proposal and the technical justification describing the use of HPC/D resource to address the science proposed as described in the Computational Details. The assessors will also see an anonymised set of track-record metrics to help determine the capacity of a team to conduct the proposed research.
A second stage will be optional for assessors. If a reviewer decides they need more information, they will be able to reveal the identifiable track record of a team. They will also be able to see the previous use of NCMAS allocated resources if applicable, or previous HPC experience at other facilities/through other schemes, which will contain identifiable details of previous HPC/D use and research outcomes.
4.7 How do the reviewers assess the applicant's responsible use of the HPC/D resource, or likelihood of scientific return?
As with all prior NCMAS reviews, the Committee must use their expert judgement to determine whether each proposal would result in the proper use of the HPC/D resource and a scientific return on the project.
Each proposal will still have a facility technical assessment.
We encourage applicants to take extra care to sufficiently justify the technical requirements of the project, such that the facility staff can review and appropriately report on feasibility.
4.8 How can we be sure that accepted NCMAS proposals are actually feasible if the Committee can't assess the team's past experience?
As part of the review of applications, NCMAS facilities provide a technical assessment of projects.
Technical staff from the facilities are highly experienced and will flag potential technical challenges in proposals.
It is the responsibility of the NCMAS Custodians to ensure that the community has equal opportunity for the use of HPC/D resources, regardless of previous experience.
4.9 As a reviewer, how can I be sure that the applicants are being ethical when discussing their expertise and/or access to other facilities? What if we allocate time to the wrong people?
First, the Committee members review applications after facility technical review has occurred.
The Committee makes recommendations for allocations based on the merit of the science proposed.
The Committee Chair and Deputy review all allocations, and will have access to all identifying details of the applicants for use in this review, including names and affiliations.
4.10 How will this affect ECR Proposals?
All applications will be subject to anonymisation – the Proposal and Computational Details need to be written in an anonymous third-person style.
ECR applications will need to follow the same anonymisation to be compliant.
4.11 What will happen to proposals that are not sufficiently anonymised?
Anonymisation of the Proposal and Computational Details is mandatory for compliance, and applicants must follow the guidelines laid out in the Information for Applicants. If an application is found to quite obviously and blatantly disregard the anonymising guidelines, the application will be deemed noncompliant and will be withdrawn from further consideration.
If an applicant submits Proposal and Computational Details documents that do not comply with anonymous third-person style, the application will be judged non-compliant.
4.12 I've followed the guidelines, but my work is so niche (or my methods so unique) that I fear reviewers may be able to determine my identity.
Will I be flagged as non-compliant?
If applicants follow the guidelines for A3P style, their application will be compliant with anonymisation.
It is not necessary to "water down" or obscure your science, methods, or tools, it is simply your responsibility to write about them in the third-person, in a way that does not intentionally identify yourself.
4.13 How will the process deal with Conflicts of Interest?
In some respects, Conflicts of Interest between a reviewer and a given proposal are a bit simpler. If the reviewers do not know who the applicants are, how can they be conflicted?
As always, reviewers can (and should) identify issues not identified by our system, such as personal conflicts.
The Committee members will not be assigned their own proposal for review.
4.14 Won't this change make it harder to be awarded HPC/D resource?
No. NCMAS is allocating approximately the same amount of resource as in the previous cycle.
If the number of submitted proposals were to rise, this would affect the oversubscription rate, but this has always been the case. The same is true if the requested allocation amount increases across individual applications, and therefore the total requested amount could increase.
This process is not about making it harder for some people or easier for others to get HPC/D resources; it is about ensuring that the best proposals are selected.
Your best chance of being awarded HPC/D resource is the same it has always been: think of a great idea, and write a great proposal.
4.15 Instructions within the form state not to use author names in the Proposal and Computational Details, but also state that referencing is essential.
Where do references go if I can't use names in the text?
The intention of the statement about the author name is to write application documents such that they cannot be matched to an identifiable author/applicant.
It is fine to write "As Doe et al. (2018) showed..." within the text as long as the writing is such that it is not obvious that the author of the application is Doe.
Please read through the Anonymisation Guide – this will demonstrate how referencing, with names, should look.
A reference list can still appear at the end of your document and it is acceptable for the references in this list to include names, including the application author's name. This is not seen as identifiable as a new project in the same field of science might have a similar reference list.
5.1 How should I estimate my Service Unit request for Setonix-GPU?
Researchers planning their migration from NVIDIA-based GPU systems like Pawsey's Topaz and NCI's Gadi to the AMD-based Setonix-GPU should use the following example strategy to calculate their Service Units request.
Simulation walltime on a single NVIDIA V100 GPU: 1h
Safe estimate for Service Units usage on a single Setonix's AMD MI250X GPU: 1h * 1/2 * 128 = 64 Service Units
5.2 What is the migration pathway for Setonix-GPU?
The Setonix's AMD MI250X GPUs have a very specific migration pathway related to CUDA to HIP and OpenACC to OpenMP conversions. Pawsey is working closely with research groups within PaCER project (https://pawsey.org.au/pacer/) and with vendors to further extend the list of supported codes.
Please see: https://www.amd.com/en/technologies/infinity-hub